Task Format
GoldenViewVQA
Multi-view visual question answering with evidence-source identification in driving scenes.
LitTraceQA
Literature-grounded question answering with paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer generation.
How to Participate
Use the Hugging Face datasets for the public data and input-only test splits, then submit prediction files to the official evaluator Space. The evaluator is the source of record for held-out scores and leaderboard rankings.
Official Evaluator Tasks
- GoldenViewVQA: submit the dataset
testsplit to the evaluator task namedgoldenviewvqa. - LitTraceQA required track: submit the dataset
testsplit tolittraceqa-test. - LitTraceQA optional diagnostic track: submit
test-extratolittraceqa-test-extra. This is recommended but not required for shared-task participation.
Submission Rules
- Each Hugging Face account, email address, and team name can be registered only once; registration is not editable after submission.
- Each registered account may submit up to five times per evaluator task per day. The three evaluator tasks have separate daily limits, counted by the evaluator server day in America/Toronto time.
- Files that fail sanity checks, such as malformed JSONL, missing required ids, duplicate ids, or unexpected ids, do not count toward the daily limit.
- The leaderboard is separated by task and displays the best successful submission for each team. Contact emails are collected for organizers and are not shown on the leaderboard.
- Use exactly the same team name on the evaluator, in the system paper title/results, and in the OpenReview
teamnamefield.
Final System Paper Submission Instructions
Participants in the GroundLM 2026 shared tasks are invited to submit final system description papers together with their test outputs and code. These papers should document the submitted system, experimental setup, official results, and lessons learned during participation. Papers are welcome regardless of leaderboard position, including submissions that focus on negative results, limitations, or detailed error analysis.
Participants are encouraged to begin drafting the system description before the test-set release, then update the official results and analysis after evaluation.
Recommended Content
- Abstract and introduction: summarize the task, system, main methods, and key results.
- Data and preprocessing: describe the released data, input processing, prompts, augmentation, and any external resources.
- System architecture and training: report models, retrieval or grounding pipelines, prompting strategies, fine-tuning methods, checkpoints, hyperparameters, frameworks, and compute resources.
- Experimental results: include official test-set results from the online evaluator, all reported leaderboard metrics for each submitted task, development-set results where relevant, submitted-run comparisons, model variants, and ablations when available.
- Error analysis: discuss representative failures, difficult examples, grounding errors, retrieval mistakes, evidence-selection issues, and differences between development and test performance.
- Conclusion, limitations, and ethics: summarize findings, future work, known limitations, and responsible-use considerations for grounded multimodal or literature-grounded systems.
Title and Submission Materials
The paper title should use the team name from the shared-task submission, for example:
<Team Name> at GroundLM 2026 Shared Tasks: <Paper Title>
Use the same team name when registering on the evaluator Space, reporting leaderboard
results in the system paper, and filling the teamname field in OpenReview.
Teams participating in both GoldenViewVQA and LitTraceQA are encouraged to describe both
systems in a single paper. Final shared-task submissions should include the paper PDF,
the JSONL test-output files uploaded to the evaluator, code or reproducibility materials,
all external data and models used,
and the information needed by the organizers for the shared-task overview paper.
Before Submitting
- Use the official ACL style files without modifying margins, spacing, fonts, or page dimensions.
- Keep the system description paper within 4-8 pages of main content; references may use additional pages.
- Include author names, affiliations, and contact information in the final system paper.
- Clearly disclose external datasets, pretrained models, tools, APIs, and generated or synthetic data.
- Confirm that the submitted PDF opens correctly and that tables, figures, and links render as intended.
GoldenViewVQA: Multi-View Grounded VQA for Driving Scenes
GoldenViewVQA evaluates whether multimodal systems can identify the visual evidence needed to answer a question. Given six synchronized NuScenes camera views and a question, a model must select the supporting camera view and answer the multiple-choice question.
Evaluation
Submissions should contain one JSON object per question with a question identifier, predicted supporting view, and predicted answer choice.
{"question_id": "sfall_0001_causality", "predicted_view": "CAM_FRONT", "predicted_answer_id": "A"}
The development evaluator reports micro and macro view accuracy, answer accuracy, and joint accuracy.
The official online evaluator is now available for the held-out input-only test set with
private gold labels. For GoldenViewVQA, submit predictions for the test
split through the evaluator Space after registering your team.
Dataset and Test Release
The Hugging Face dataset contains the public development data and the input-only
test split for official evaluation. Use the development split for task
familiarization, data loading, prompt and model development, local evaluation, and
submission-format checks; use the test split for leaderboard submissions.
Resources
The dataset provides benchmark annotations and NuScenes-relative image paths. Participants must obtain NuScenes through the official access process and comply with its terms of use.
LitTraceQA: Literature-Grounded Question Answering
LitTraceQA evaluates whether systems can answer research questions with grounded evidence from scientific papers. Given a question and requested answer types, a system must retrieve the relevant paper or papers from the released metadata pool, identify coarse evidence locations, and return the final answer in the requested format.
Evaluation
Submissions should contain one JSON object per question with a stable query identifier, retrieved paper IDs, supporting evidence locations, and the answer object.
{"query_id": "q_001", "gold_papers": [{"paper_id": "acl2025_00005"}], "evidence": [{"paper_id": "acl2025_00005", "source_type": "table", "locator": {"page": 6, "table_id": "Table 4"}}], "answer": {"freeform": {"text": "14.70"}}}
The public evaluator reports macro paper retrieval precision, recall, and F1; macro
evidence precision, recall, and F1 using coarse evidence matches; and answer metrics for
multiple-choice, freeform, and table outputs. The official online evaluator is now
available for the hidden test labels. Register your team on the evaluator Space, submit
the required test split there, and optionally submit test-extra
for additional diagnostic results.
Dataset and Test Release
The Hugging Face dataset includes gold validation records, input-only validation records,
input-only test records, input-only test-extra records, sample submissions, a searchable
paper metadata pool, a machine-readable schema, and a local evaluator.
The test split is required for LitTraceQA shared-task participation.
The test-extra split is recommended for additional diagnostic evaluation,
but it is not required. Official scores for both splits are produced by the online
evaluator Space.
Resources
LitTraceQA annotations and benchmark files are released under CC BY-NC 4.0. Paper metadata remains subject to the original publishers' terms, and PDFs are not redistributed in the dataset.